The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scrivens, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, Vol. 127, No. 2, 72-77 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1466424007075455

The future of regulation and governance

Ellie Scrivens

Keele University, UK, e.e.j.scrivens{at}keele.ac.uk

The NHS in England is undergoing considerable structural change as it introduces more locally accountable hospitals, greater patient choice, payment by results and local general practitioner based commissioning of services. To deliver the anticipated service improvement associated with these changes, there is a need to ensure that the reformed NHS provides incentives for service improvement, while at the same time maintaining consistency in access to services and the safe delivery of services. The UK government is committed to reducing bureaucracy, which is based upon the associated desire to reduce the overall costs of regulation, while increasing the accountability of health services. This requires a new approach to regulation, balancing a standardised concept of quality with incentives to encourage local innovation in service design and delivery.

Accountability through regulation brings with it the burdens of supplying information for audit and inspection, which are placed upon the organization. This article examines the issues that need to be considered in the design of an effective regulatory system; one that must operate within a restricted cost envelope, and in particular focuses on the concept of reducing the administrative burden associated with both inspection and self-assessment and the need to make these proportionate to a demonstrable contribution to the improvement in regulation and the ultimate goal of improvement in quality of healthcare.

Key Words: Devolution • governance • healthcare • inspection • quality


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of HealthHome page
M. Adil
Risk-based regulatory system and its effective use in health and social care
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, July 1, 2008; 128(4): 196 - 201.
[Abstract] [PDF]